|
New Developments
Spotlight Optical Stimulation Tools
by Warren Grill, senior technical editor
Artificial electrical stimulation of the nervous system is one of
the foundations of neurotechnology. However, the use of electrical
currents to stimulate the nervous system presents several challenges.
It is difficult to achieve selective stimulation of only the targeted
neurons without activating neighboring neurons. Further, electrochemical
reactions at the electrode-tissue interface may lead to electrode
dissolution or tissue damage.
As an alternative, magnetic stimulation can be used to stimulate
non-invasively. However, the power requirements for magnetic stimulation
are high and the resulting stimulation is non-selective. Two recent
publications may be harbingers of a future where lightanother
form of electromagnetic energyis used to stimulate the nervous
system.
Hirase and colleagues from Rafael Yustes lab at Columbia University
applied laser illumination to depolarize and excite single neurons
in vitro. This work follows on the classic work of Fork who, in
the early 1970s, demonstrated that laser illumination could produce
excitation of molluscan neurons through a reversible, but unknown
mechanism. Hirase et al., reporting in the Journal of Neurobiology,
used modern two-photon techniques that enabled the laser light to
be focused much more precisely than the technology used by Fork.
They demonstrated that excitation of pyramidal neurons in brain
slices from mouse visual cortex required the illumination to be
applied tangential to the membrane of the cell, and that excitation
was ineffective if the laser was focused below or within the cell.
Although not entirely clear, the experiments suggested two mechanisms.
First, the data support that light-induced membrane depolarization
resulted from a photochemical reaction that produced reactive oxygen
species adjacent to the cell. The second mechanism was a transient
perforation of the membrane that quickly re-sealed after the light
was discontinued.
Illumination was able to excite neurons at short latency and the
probability of excitation was modulated by both the intensity and
wavelength of illumination. Thus, two-photon laser illumination
provides a selective and controllable method to excite selectively
single neurons. This will provide a powerful tool to understand
processing within networks of neurons, and lays a foundation for
further work developing light-based methods for directly stimulating
neurons.
While Hirase et al. used focused illumination to achieve selective
stimulation of single neurons, a report in Neuron by Zemelan and
colleagues from Gero Miesenböcks lab at the Memorial
Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center demonstrated genetic manipulation
to make only certain neurons responsive to illumination. They expressed
in cultured hippocampal neurons genes coding for elements of the
invertebrate retina. The retinal elements produced a light-controlled
source of excitatory current in the effected cells, as they would
in the native retina.
When exposed to light the neurons that were transfected with the
retinal elements depolarized and generated action potentials at
latencies between less than one second and several tens of seconds.
The pattern of firing ranged from single spikes to bursts of spikes,
as would be observed during conventional intracellular recording,
and the firing frequency could be increased by increasing the light
intensity. The variable nature of genetic transfection was presumably
the cause of the variability in responsiveness across neurons.
Alternating periods of dark and light demonstrated that there was
hysteresis in the neuronal response, that the latencies were long
and variable, and that there was apparent continued excitation after
the illumination was turned off. These effects were presumably the
result of expressing only the minimal subset of the retinal elements
needed to produce light responsiveness, rather than the full complement
of retinal regulatory proteins. Application of this technique in
vivo would provide a means to selectively excite only a specific
class or classes of neurons that were transfected using cell-specific
methods.
Optical technology has had a huge impact on everything from entertainment
to communications. Within the realm of neurotechnology modern optical
methods have greatly increased our ability to see into the nervous
system with such things as multi-photon microscopy and chemical-dependent
and voltage -dependent fluorescent dyes. The recent advances demonstrating
optical stimulation of the nervous system provide powerful new tools
to study neural function. They are perhaps telling of a day when
neurotechnology will follow in the footsteps of communications technology
and move from electrically-based devices to optically-based devices.
|
|